Ras Power, the I said,
----------------------------------------------
ark, ini don't think neutral is to be non-aligned.
non-aligned is to take action where it is for the contribution of the betterment of man kind, no matter who suggest it
neutral is to take neither side
----------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? What do you mean "ini" don't think neutral is to be non-aligned? Which "we" are you talking about, because I know the "we" you are talking about can't be you and Haile Selassie I.
Go question Selassie I if you don't Iverstand what He is saying, those words I posted are Selassie I words.
Here is Selassie I answer
By the word "neutral" We do not, of course, mean that abstention from political activity which has been for so long the hallmark of a Switzerland. We can no more refrain from political activity in the year 1961 than man today can voluntarily refrain from partaking of the radioactive fall-out which will be bestowed upon him should a nuclear holocaust erupt on this globe. Nor does neutrality mean that without taking sides, we content ourselves with urging that the powers most intimately concerned negotiate in good faith to the solution of the issues in dispute between them; we have passed the point where prayerful pleading serves any purpose other than to debase those who thereby abdicate any responsibility or power to influence events.
Neutral and non-aligned mean to take neither side, but to agree or disagree and act accordingly. So if you agree with a person or nation, then you act in support of that agreement, but anything else that the person or nation brings and tries to lump in together with what you agreed to, you refuse and take no part in any additions, unless you also agree with the additions.
Ras Power, the I said,
----------------------------------------
now about that thing that it is who opinion, brother ini don't believe in that, salvation is only jah opinion, if i ask how to make a juice then you will tell i that is your opinion, but salvation, ini can only follow the road the is set before ini
----------------------------------------
AND
----------------------------------------
rook fari, ini only speak the truth as i see it, if it offends you then i am sorry, Bob Marley said the truth is an offense not a shame. how do i offend you brother
no one defends i, the truth is i defense, i talk how and what attitude. more fire is the chant you cannot hear talk,
the truth will be reviled
the bible say a fool get angry quickly,
blessed love
----------------------------------------
You speak with such arrogance. That is the kind of arrogance that irritates Rook and others. You act like everything you say is Truth. Do you think that you know everything? Your quote above about neutral is just one example of many showing that you don't know everything. Selassie I knows everything, you don't.
When I mentioned your opinion about Emmanuel, calling it an opinion. You talk about salvation and speak like your opinion about Emmauel is not opinion, but is just a fact that you are speaking. People who can't see Selassie I for the God who He is, go on the same way as you, they talk of their opinion about Selassie I and give many "answers" and "truths" of why their opinion about Selassie I is more than just opinion.
You talk about "the truth as i see it", and then talk about the truth is an offense not a shame. So what are you saying, is it the truth, or is it just the truth as you see it? If you want to reference your words as the truth is an offense not a shame, then get off that double talk where you say it is the truth as you see it.
You try to come off as some peaceful person who is just reasoning, but hide little knives to stab people along the way. You try to call Rook a fool without "technically" calling him a fool. You knew full well that your comment "the bible say a fool get angry quickly", would likely be interpreted by rook as you calling him a fool. So that you can get him vex so that he would say things against you so that you appear to be attacked by him. If you were just trying to help Rook with his vexation, you could have said many different things, but you instead choose to stab him with your hidden knife, so that you can act like a victim when he fights back.
You are getting into a habit of using those hidden knives too often in an attempt to make yourself look like a "victim who is just trying to speak the truth and is being attacked by others for no reason". You have used that technique on many people. I am getting tired of that habit, and don't know how long I will tolerate it. I am getting tired of wasting my time exposing your knives, and if it continues I will choose to get rid of the knife bearer. If you can't reason without hiding knives, then it is better to not reason here, I would prefer that your knives are right out in the open for all to see. If you can't refrain from your knife hiding, then I will cause all of your future posts to be "refrained".
|
|
