Greetings,
Za-Za, I read your last post again and I noticed a few things that I wanted to clear up.
the I said,
------------------------
With my thread on the Church Gad said that "I look down on others" when I started the thread just to explain the whole concept of the church and how it came in to being. And I'm the agressor?
------------------------
Japhet didn't say that you look down on others because you started the thread explaining the church. He said that because from the beginning, you were speaking in a way, as if you looked down on people who didn't accept what Foxe said, like they are lower or ignorant for not accepting it. This may or may not have been your intention, but this is how it came across.
And concerning this thing that the I said,
-----------------------
If I remind you of such certain people characteristics than they are ones who try to share a explain things to people than get dejected from those same ones as I have here!
-----------------------
That is not the characteristic I was speaking about. One of the characteristics is that it seems like you feel that you are higher than others who don't believe the same things that you do. It comes through in your speech, by the way you reason, and also by the names you like to call people to belittle them (Rocky and Peebles, for example).
And some other things that describe the characteristic I am talking about is also shown in these quotes,
----------------
Your speaking of a Nomad like Cain was ok I agree to that!!!!
----------------
This is clever little statement (although not that clever), but it is not really saying anything, it is just picking out peoples words, adding your own words to change the meaning of their statement, and then using the words to put down another. The same characteristic as Bhudaizm.
And this,
-----------------
So much talk of JA rasta from cats who only been there a COUPLE of times! But in that time they feel that they were filled with total knowledge and way of RASTA. AND KEEP REFERING TO THEM LIKE THEY ARE THEiR NOW.....why?
Elders in JA.....Elders from bobo in JA....>Elder from dis and that.....so!
I know more elders in america then in JA and its probley more in Cananda as well
-----------------
Firstly, you don't know how many times anyone has gone to JA, or if they have gone at all, but this assumption works very well in your statement, and this assuming characteristic is exactly the way Bhudaizm speaks.
So you say that the people think that they are filled with total knowledge and the way of Rasta. It seems that you think that this Foxe's church is filled with total knowledge and the way of Rasta.
The quotes I mentioned, along with other similar quotes, describe the characteristic I am talking about. Many people have knowledge and explain things, and are rejected by the people that they tell these things to. But not all of these people put down others for rejecting their statements, or speak in the manner that you do. And it is your style of reasoning in general that is the same characteristic as Bhudaizm, regardless of what topics are spoken about.
I just wanted to make sure that what I said in I last post doesn't make you think I accept all the things you said in your last post. My last post is what it is and it goes no farther or less than that.
Ark I
RasTafarI
Haile Selassie I
|
|