Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website  
Return to Reasoning List
 

Here is a link to this page:
http://www.jah-rastafari.com/forum/message-view.asp?message_group=7340&start_row=131


The Murder of George Floyd and Subsequent Riots

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071 - 8081 - 9091 - 100
101 - 110111 - 120121 - 130131 - 140141 - 150151 - 160161 - 170171 - 180181 - 190191 - 200
201 - 210211
Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)
Messenger: CarterBlunt Sent: 6/15/2020 11:56:04 PM
Reply

After close examination of the facts you posted, I think there is enough circumstantial evidence to conclude that Soros is a personal conspirator with his slimy fingers in the movement. I also rule your Nazi comment as fair! Lol, he is such a creepy dude.

Although, sometimes you post multiple videos that repeat the exact same content as the last video, which is super annoying.


Messenger: The BANNED — Hemphill Sent: 6/16/2020 6:15:09 AM
Reply

That video is always coming and going. Getting posted, getting banned. It took me sometime just to find some versions that had enough authentic video of the interview. Didn’t know which ones would play etc.. Didn’t necessarily mean for the redundancy but the system covers for George Soros. Snopes, politifact, mainstream media, google searches, social media scrubbing videos and info on him.

It drives me crazy that people like IPXninja just say: “Nope, Soros is a good guy who donates and helps out cause, he’s not a Nazi. Look his website says he escaped the Nazis occupation in Hungary by forging power work! Snopes and CNN say your wrong!”

Well a little bit of digging and you find that he WORKED WITH THE NAZIS to infiltrate Jews, report them, help confiscate property, and turn them into to be killed. He called it the happiest time of his life and feels no guilt.

Yes, this devil has his fingers in everything. Donating and funding billions to run things in his favor. Google George Soros and the first sites that come up all cover for him and call anything bad about him a “right wing conspiracy theory”

It’s an uphill battle

I do appreciate you viewing the information though. Thank you


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 6/16/2020 6:34:09 AM
Reply

Black people been reporting stories of George Floyd mongst black people all across the world for the past hundred years. And telling I own personal stories of I George Floyd shituations within this white supremacist system.

George Floyd


Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 6/16/2020 9:17:53 AM
Reply

First of all, again... Infowars. Alex Jones. You KEEP using content by Alex Jones but at the same time you don't want me to talk about Alex Jones because you know he has credibility problems.

Secondly, the video OBVIOUSLY uses its graphics as the background of the video to make it seem like George Soros was saying that everything that was happening, that all the imagery Alex Jones showed you, was good when in actually around 1:18 into the video he called it evil. But this is the problem when soundbytes are snatched and taken out of context. Alex Jones basically tried to change the context by implying that Soros was happy with what he himself called evil and that's not the case. But you don't bother trying to fact check your infomation god, Alex Jones. You just allow Jones and other conspiracy theorist to spoon feed you what you think is truth when in reality they are lying because they'll say ANYTHING for money, including that children victims of mass shootings are "crisis actors" so that their families get harassed and have to move several times. It's sick behavior against children, but his followers never hold his feet to the fire because they have a dependency on him; and perhaps... love him.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/

Even a simple visit to Snopes, because this site has made it its job to fact check, will show you that these are lies against Soros who was only 9 at the start of the war and 14 when the Nazis surrendered. His family survived by having false documents and to you that's bad. Because what? They should have said "Hey, we're Jews. Please kill us." ??? Did you not watch Schindler's List? There were Jews who tried to hide and they weren't the only ones to try to evade detection. There were also many black people that escaped persecution in the south because they were so light skin that they were able to pass as white. In Trevor Noah's book, Born a Crime, he talks about how his identity had to be somewhat hidden and his father had to walk across the street so that their family wasn't found out. You think people who are oppressed are wrong for trying to survive?! That's insane.

People started saying George Soros was an SS in the National Socialist German workers party. And they used his words to say that working for the nazis was the best time in his life. But the minimum age for the SS was 17. In Jojo Rabbit Taika Waitit played Hitler. In that movie (a satire) you have Scarlet Johansson's character hiding a young jewish girl who eventually got to come out under the pretense of being related to Jojo who wanted to be an SS officer because of his blind nationalism. You should watch that movie.

The idea of a Jew or black person intentionally threatening their own survival to avoid "Forged documents" is moronic and I don't even mean to insult you personally. I just don't understand how you could actually believe that. Most black people didn't have the option or choice to blend in. Even black people who were free could be captured and forced into or back into slavery by someone who simply stole their papers. Let me get back to Soros before I get upset...

Someone lied and used a picture of one Oskar Groening and tried to say that was George Soros. Why do you need to lie if the person you're smearing and commiting libel and slander against is actually guilty? Why?

In the doctored (Alex Jones version) interview, it at first seems like Soros was helping them, but what he actually said was that he was brought along and was a spectator. So he saw it happening. He had to watch other Jewish people be taken away. However, what we don't even know is what this little boy even knew was happening. Earlier on he said that he was ignorant about the whole series of events and that's why it was the happiest time in his life. It is because his father SHIELDED HIM from the reality of what was going on. This reminds me of another period movie.

Life is Beautiful (1997)

"Determined to shelter his son from the horrors of his surroundings, Guido convinces Giosue that their time in the camp is merely a game."

I don't imagine the circumstances are the same. I'm not suggesting they were. However, I am suggesting that George's father did what he did to allow his son to survive. And he had to pretend to be a Christian then so be it. I would have done the same for my children. And no, I wouldn't feel guilty about it and neither should they because their survival is NOT THEIR FAULT.


Another film, a documentary, called The Invisibles

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/29/689272533/the-invisibles-reveals-how-some-jews-survived-nazi-germany-by-hiding-in-plain-si

"You just had to ignore the fear in your gut and push it away, become someone else," Lévy says. "I had to try to lose myself in the masses and forget that I was scared and that I was someone who once submitted to the Nazi race laws. I had to act like a regular Berliner. And this is what saved me in the end."

This woman was taken in by family friends and dyed her hair blonde to pass.

So understand, George Soros was not like JoJo Rabbit and did not wish to be some kind of SS sidekick. Nor did he help round up Jews or sell people out. These are all lies, designed to destroy the reputation, NOT OF THE BOY, but the MAN. Why? Because the MAN, George Soros, has the nerve to fund causes that the right doesn't support. Otherwise they wouldn't give a damn about his CHILDHOOD. Their leader said he grabs women by the p-ssy and they say that's just boys will be boys lockeroom talk. Nope! He's a monster and a sexual predator. Anything their people do they'll be like "but that was 20 years ago. They've changed."

It's propaganda. And I hate conspiracy theories in general because they take some things that are true (ie. George Soros was there and survived Nazi Germany) and then add a bunch of lies to say "George Soros survived because he was one of the Nazis and happily participated". That's not what he said at all. He was being honest and said that at that age he saw the suffering and didn't believe it could actually touch him. He said perhaps children couldn't make the connection. What connection? What he understands now, as an adult. That it was evil. And part of that is because his father shielded him. They didn't have CNN telling them how bad the Nazis were. They were isolated and insulated from any outside source of news that wasn't pro-nazi. That's why at the end of Jojo Rabbit not everyone even knew the war was over. Hindsight is always 20/20 and if you want to judge this little 14 year old boy that's on you. Maybe you don't remember being 14 or never had a 14 year old son. I have. But there is no way he didn't know he was Jewish and that it was important to hide it, and no way he would have anti-Jewish sympathies against his own family. This was only a means of survival.

I don't know. Maybe it is a side effect of white privilege that its hard for you to understand survival, but you should watch the movies I mentioned and try to empathize with the Jews who had to go through this. THEY understand. Maybe... just maybe... you should actually ask a bunch of Jews what they think of how George Soros and his family survived, just like I told you that you should have asked black people about defunding the police. Why do you always presume to know everything when you have no concept of the experience informing these other points of view?


Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 6/16/2020 9:37:09 AM
Reply

@Carter

Please.... please do not fall victim to agent H's propaganda. He doesn't care what the truth is the same way you do. He's only quick to judge people who are not in his party. Read my previous post. The only reason that George Soros is depicted in so many conspiracy theories is one reason and one reason alone. Money. The right is scared of how much money he's willing to spend, just like the left was afraid of the Koch brothers. Because money = power in capitalist America. But do they mention that Soros and the surviving Koch brother have teamed up on foreign policy?

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2019/06/30/soros-and-koch-brothers-team-end-forever-war-policy/WhyENwjhG0vfo9Um6Zl0JO/story.html

And hey... if you don't believe me about Soros check out any or all of the following:

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/11/17405784/george-soros-not-a-nazi-trump

quote: His father, Tivadar Soros, recognized the threat of Nazism early. In an interview with the New Yorker in 2001, George Soros said of Tivadar, “My father was ahead of the curve, because he recognized the moment the Germans came in that this was a different world and one had to act differently.” In another interview, Soros said that when the Nazis invaded Hungary in March 1944, his father brought the family together and said, “This is an emergency. If we remain law-abiding citizens and continue our current existence, we are going to perish.”

This foresight is what stuck with Soros and allowed him to become a billionaire investor who uses a lot of that money to fund righteous causes.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/10/viral-meme-misidentifies-nazi-guard-as-soros/

https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-49584157

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/feb/10/facebook-posts/no-george-soros-wasnt-nazi-soldier/


Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 6/16/2020 10:01:20 AM
Reply

This all comes from Snopes:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/

Soros: “Well, of course, … I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was — well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in the markets — that if I weren’t there — of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would — would — would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the — whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the — I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.“

Soros’s biographer, Michael T. Kaufman, described Soros as “visibly dumbfounded” by Kroft’s “prosecutorial” line of questioning during the interview. Kaufman addressed the claim that Soros was involved in confiscating Jewish property in his book, Soros: The Life and Times of a Messianic Billionaire (Knopf, 2002).

While it’s true, Kaufman wrote, that one of the jobs delegated to young George’s temporary protector (a Hungarian bureaucrat named Baumbach) was taking inventory of Jewish properties already confiscated by the Nazis, the extent of Soros’s participation was accompanying Baumbach on one of those assignments:

Shortly after George went to live with Baumbach, the man was assigned to take inventory on the vast estate of Mor Kornfeld, an extremely wealthy aristocrat of Jewish origin. The Kornfeld family had the wealth, wisdom, and connections to be able to leave some of its belongings behind in exchange for permission to make their way to Lisbon. Baumbach was ordered to go to the Kornfeld estate and inventory the artworks, furnishings, and other property. Rather than leave his “godson” behind in Budapest for three days, he took the boy with him. As Baumbach itemized the material, George walked around the grounds and spent time with Kornfeld’s staff. It was his first visit to such a mansion, and the first time he rode a horse. He collaborated with no one and he paid attention to what he understood to be his primary responsibility: making sure that no one doubted that he was Sandor Kiss [Soros’s assumed identity]. Among his practical concerns was to make sure that no one saw him pee.


George’s father, Tivadar Soros, provided a similar account of the incident in his 1965 autobiography, Masquerade: Dancing Around Death in Nazi Occupied Hungary (note: Tivadar Soros gave the name of the ministry official as “Baufluss,” but Soros confirmed to us that the correct name is Baumbach):

Baufluss was charged by the ministry with inventorying confiscated Jewish estates. He was home only at weekends; the rest of his time he spent taking inventory in the provinces. During the week George passed his time alone in Baufluss’ s apartment. Lacking anything else to do, he caught the attention of some of his schoolmates, who lived in the building across the way. Communicating by hand signals, they seemed surprised to see him holed up in somebody else’s house. The following week the kind-hearted Baufluss, in an effort to cheer the unhappy lad up, took him off with him to the provinces. At the time he was working in Transdanubia, west of Budapest, on the model estate of a Jewish aristocrat, Baron Moric Kornfeld. There they were wined and dined by what was left of the staff. George also met several other ministry officials, who immediately took a liking to the young man, the alleged godson of Mr Baufluss. He even helped with the inventory. Surrounded by good company, he quickly regained his spirits. On Saturday he returned to Budapest.

“He even helped with the inventory,” Tivadar Soros wrote. It’s a detail one doesn’t find in Kaufman’s book. Some may rush to cite this as proof that Soros was indeed a “collaborator,” but given that it occurred on only one occasion, and that Soros was under an imperative to play the part of Baumbach’s godson while in the company of actual Nazi collaborators, it demands stretching the meaning of “collaborator” beyond all reasonable limits.

Moreover, these biographical passages demonstrate that Steve Kroft’s claim on 60 Minutes that Soros “accompanied his phony godfather on his appointed rounds, confiscating property from the Jews” is flat-out false. Tivadar Soros wrote that most of young George’s time under Baumbach’s care was spent alone in the latter’s apartment. Both Tivadar and Kaufman report that George only resided with Baumbach for a short time — a matter of weeks — before Tivadar, concerned that his son’s real identity was in danger of exposure, shipped him off to spend the summer of 1944 with his mother (who herself was living under an assumed name at a lakeside resort some distance from Budapest). George Soros spent no further time with Baumbach.


Messenger: The BANNED — Hemphill Sent: 6/16/2020 4:18:16 PM
Reply

Snopes is less credible than Wikipedia. It’s not a source.

Fact: Soros admitted to working with the Nazis and called it the happiest time of his life. Watch the videos. I posted several. The “Alex Jones” one was not made by Alex Jones, but a fan. The video has b roll in it for effect. The other videos are not “sound bites”.

Get off of the leftist snopes and politifact and look at what he actually said.

But you are a lost cause. No hope. You can see him say it, watch him say it, then deny he said it.

Lmfao


Messenger: The BANNED — Hemphill Sent: 6/16/2020 4:51:37 PM
Reply

Imagine bending over backwards, making a fool of yourself, to defend known satanists Aleister Crowley, Anton Levaey, and Albert Pike (founder of the KKK), and an admitted Nazi collaborator George Soros.... This is a new level of derangement.

Snopes, politifact, CNN, and Vox are all preschool level “research” and completely devoid of truth.

Maybe that should be the next side conversation here.. exposing these bought and paid for liberal propaganda “fact checking sources”

Lol. Too easy.

Snopes is more than likely paid for by Soros.

For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. It is run by a husband and wife team – that’s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research.

The reason for the questions – or skepticism – is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues.

Their articles are often incredibly biased and more akin to mopping up for liberals than any semblance of real fact-checking, and the background of their lead fact-checker sheds light on the mindset of the site.

The Daily Caller reported that the main fact-checker for the site is Kim Lacapria, an outspoken liberal and failed blogger for Inquisitr — a blog ironically notorious for hoaxes and fake quotes.

During her time at Inquisitr, where her blogs reportedly regularly garnered just 10-20 shares, Lacapria exposed her bias.

Omar Mateen, the radical Islamic terrorist who killed 49 people in Orlando, Florida, was a registered Democrat. This was a fact, one that Lacapria should have verified and simply reported. Instead, she made the excuse that Mateen may “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”

Oh, and condensing an hour long interview into 3 minuets with b-roll is not “doctoring”. It’s highlighting a specific, pertinent point. That’s why I posted several of the same interview, one of them like 28 minuets long.

You can’t “snopes” your way out of truth that is readily seen and heard.


Messenger: CarterBlunt Sent: 6/16/2020 5:27:43 PM
Reply

IPX, I think you are falling into a trap of giving people the benefit of the doubt, or have a naivety about human nature. That is, you're too logical to give actions their proper scrutiny. He SMILED when he said it. It was the "happiest" time in his life, because he didn't see evil. It didn't affect him. He was just a player, it forged his character. I understood what Soros was talking about. He is a complete sociopath. It's ok to judge people by their nature.

Was I cruel when I was 14? Yes, but there is a difference. I always felt remorse. When I was in preschool, a black girl showed me her "private" and I thought it was interesting, so this white girl showed me hers and I ran off and snitched on the white girl, and they made her apologize to me. I immediately felt like an ass. When I was in 7th grade I think, a girl swatted me in the nose with a trapperkeeper and I punched her in the face. When we were in the principal's office, she legit cried because her feelings were hurt. I felt bad. George Soros does not give a damn about anyone's feelings. He is engaged in amoral activity. It has nothing to do with survival.

Does this mean every dollar ever used in his name is poison? No, but it does mean it's a power grab. It's not like that money comes without conditions, they figured out who they were dealing with, and they got their mind right. In the case of BLM, it means they will strategically insert feel-good bullshit instead of real reform, staged bullshit like cops kneeling with protesters and white people washing feet. Ineffectual slogans like "defund the police". Don't just judge people by their actions, judge where those actions are coming from. Some people are predators.

And it doesn't NEED to be Soros himself. The organizations vetted the recipients, he vetted the organizations. It's the same as gangsta rap. Rappers teach the youth moronic values, white owned record labels pay them to keep making more substance-free media. Is the music good? It's got a good beat, flow, creative storytelling, etc, so it has good production value. But if you're an artist who has all of that, but also has lyrics that educate and uplift the community, you won't get that contract. Same with tippy top conspiracies and cults. Even Alex Jones showed us a lot of devastating info about secret societies, and like Hemphill, sometimes was able to back up his accusations.

And yes Hemphill, we all have to constantly question whether our information is accurate. There are a lot of "amoral" people pushing these agendas on BOTH sides.

Also, Snopes IS garbage, been that way a long time now. If someone calls themselves "fact checkers" nowadays, you can safely assume they are propagandists. Although, the only example that comes to mind right now is when Washington Post gave Bernie "3 pinnochios", that was pretty funny. I don't really remember with Snopes, since it's been so long since ANYONE cited Snopes. Lol


Messenger: CarterBlunt Sent: 6/16/2020 6:24:55 PM
Reply

Hemphill, this last post doesn't look like your own thoughts, it looks like you are taking clippings from a right wing propaganda article, and just spamming us with whatever you think is vaguely related to the subject.(but it isn't always related, is it?)


1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071 - 8081 - 9091 - 100
101 - 110111 - 120121 - 130131 - 140141 - 150151 - 160161 - 170171 - 180181 - 190191 - 200
201 - 210211

Return to Reasoning List




RastafarI
 
Haile Selassie I