I believe I said early on that I wouldn't live close to a cell tower. However, I also explained the difference in how 5G (as in 5th generation) differs from 4G and that it's not about signal power/strength and therefore 5G cannot cause any more damage than 4G.
With social distancing covid-19 cases went down. What were people doing at that time? Weren't they mostly at home? So if they were in homes near 5G towers one would suspect that they had more exposure during the lockdown period, not less. So now that the lockdowns are being lifted the cases in some areas are going up. So how is that even possibly linked to 5G?
Radiation poisoning is a real thing. However, people who are scared of radiation shouldn't watch TV because they emit EMF.
https://emwatch.com/tv-radiation/#:~:text=Modern%20flat%2Dscreen%20TVs%2C%20whether,ray%20tube%20(CRT)%20cousins.&text=Like%20all%20low%2Dfrequency%20EMF,TV%20cannot%20be%20effectively%20screened.
As this article points out though, technology has gotten better and the range where EMF can be dangerous is very close up.
And 5G often uses older hardware to cover greater distances because the 5ghz band has a higher frequency but shorter range. That's why 5Ghz towers can be closer to residences than 2.4ghz towers. But basically everything emits EMF. If you're worried about it then just keep power sources and signal using devices several feet away from you. But the idea that a company would risk the liability involved from an aspect of the technology that is about as old as the technology itself... is just silly. And the idea that 5G could cause covid-19 as some kind of physical reaction... is one of the dumbest things I've heard being trafficked online in my lifetime.
|
|