Babylon has their own lies and deception, and I am cautious with their information too. But the pure deception and misinformation that comes from these anti this anti that group is so bad, that they are so much less trustworthy than babylon, by a long shot.
So if I can't trust babylon, how can I put trust in these groups that I have found to be so much more deceptive. I have looked into it over and over, and so much of the time there is so much deception. When they speak about studies, I look into the study if I can find it, and time after time they are either misrepresenting the conclusions of a study, or they are using studies that have made false conclusions that the data doesn't support. And when other people rightly challenge these studies, they are accused of trying to bury the "truth", when they are really trying to expose an intentional deception. That is just one example of deception out of so many types that they use.
Even still, I sometimes wait through the documentaries, actually expecting that it might be possible that they will show me this great evidence that they claim to have, and watch a whole movie of nothing useful, hoping for that one reward they promise to come at the end of the documentary, and then it ends with more nothing.
Haile Selassie I Teaches I and I this.
To be neutral is to be impartial, impartial to judge actions and policies objectively, as we see them either contributing to or detracting from the resolution of the world's problems, the preservation of peace and the improvement of the general level of man's living conditions. Thus, we may find ourselves now opposing, now supporting. now voting with, now voting against, first the East, next the West. It is the worth of the policies themselves, and not their source or sponsor, which determines the position of one who is truly neutral.
I apply that Teaching to so many things in I Life, whether concerning babylon or another group or to individuals. Sometimes this part:
as we see them either contributing to or detracting from the resolution of the world's problems, the preservation of peace and the improvement of the general level of man's living conditions.
is relevant when I use the Teaching, and other times it doesn't really apply. Even when somebody comes and says something that I already thought was true, I don't just take their word for it, if they don't provide all the necessary information, it will not be verified until I find it Iself.
Lack of complete information might make I think of something as probable, but probable is not truth or fact. And the problem is in documentary after documentary that I see from these types of groups, they don't come even close to probable, usually I see improbable and sometimes possible. And even when I see possible, they fill up a documentary with deception that seems intentional, or possibly resulting from their own ignorance of the deception, and the thing that seems possible just happens to be somewhere in the mix.