I will repeat this here, because this is where Yaa's statement was made.
General Nyabinghi, in the reasoning How should InI interpret the Ible you said,
I have been here, and already I hear people justifying eating pork, women getting out of order, homosexuality, and all manner of unriteousness.
This is what Yaa said,
Gen. Nyabinghi... you not supposed to eat meat of any colour. If Babylon says what is the white meat? Does that make them wrong? They are talking truth. It is a meat. Homosexuality is an alternative lifestyle (InI say any who choose are in flames). And as far as shrimp and whatnot... I have a feeling that we can put this down to u being one of those nyabinghi who can only dash fyah bun when u have heard another do it first.
How does her statement that you are not supposed to eat flesh of any colour justify eating pork? And next she said "Babylon says what is the white meat? Does that make them wrong? They are talking truth. It is a meat." Did the I not Iverstand what she was saying in that sentence? It in no way justified eating pork. She is pointing out that the statement that pork is white meat is not false, she is talking about the colour of pork. She is not speaking anything in support of eating pork. I don't know how you could think she was justifying the eating of pork.
She said nothing in support of homosexuality, she said "InI say any who choose are in flames". She is saying that they will recieve the judgement of Fire from the Most High. How is that justifying homosexuality?
I really don't like it when people deal with such blatent misrepresentation of another person's words. That irritates I much more than people arguing. How did you think that you could just get away with such misrepresentation? Her words are right there for people to see. We are not having a spoken conversation right now where it is easy to make such misrepresentations because people often don't remember what other people say, so they might believe the misrepresentation. People don't need to remember what other people said on this forum, they can just read it again.
Why didn't you quote her statement when you made those misrepresentations? Was it because the misrepresentation would have been too obvious? The only time somebody might get away with something like that is when I am not around, because if I am around and have enough time, I will find the original thing said.
I and I don't forget the Bible, I and I just Iverstand that some things said are the opinions of men, and are not the words of the Most High. If you want to judge people for not dealing with everything that this or that person said in the Bible, then you will be judged the same. As you judge, so will you be judged. You will be judged for your long hair, because that is spoken against in the scriptures. You will also be judged for anything else you choose to deal with that does not agree with what somebody said in the bible.
You will never hear I disagreeing with anything that Eashua Christ taught in the scriptures. That is not because I am following him blindly, it is because I agree with everything He teaches. Even though I might not Live every way that He teaches, I Iverstand that the Teaching is True and Right, and is the example of the Most High, and that I must burn out I resistance to that Teaching.
I agree with a lot of what Paul said, but I don't agree with everything. When many people read Paul's words, they excuse themselves of many things, and accept a lower standard then Eashua spoke about. They keep on talking about "Jesus" death and resurrection saved them and they are forgiven their iniquity. All the while not realizing that what is required is that they Live completely Perfect, just as God is Perfect.