You have always been obstinate and cunning, like the ass, as the people’s
advocate….
Ah, for me to learn to believe in your “genuineness,” you would first have to break your will to venerate.
Genuine – that is what I call him who goes into god-forsaken deserts and has broken his venerating heart….
…But in the towns dwell the well-fed famous philosophers – the draught animals.
For they always, as asses, pull – the people’s cart!…
You are still of the people even in your virtue, of the people with their purblind eyes – of the people who do not know what spirit is!
Spirit is the life that itself strikes into life: through its own torment it increases its own knowledge – did you know that before?
And this is the spirit’s happiness: to be anointed and by tears consecrated as a sacrificial beast – did you know that before?
And the blindness of the blind man and his seeking and groping shall yet bear witness to the power of the sun into which he gazed – did you know that before?
And the enlightened man shall learn to build with mountains! It is a small thing for the spirit to move mountains – did you know that before?
You know only the sparks of the spirit: but you do not see the anvil which the spirit is, nor the ferocity of its hammer!
In truth, you do not know the spirit’s pride! But even less could you endure the spirit’s modesty, if it should ever deign to speak!…
You are no eagles: so neither do you know the spirit’s joy in terror. And he who is not a bird shall not make his home above abysses.
You are tepid: but all deep knowledge flows cold. The innermost wells of the spirit are ice-cold: a refreshment to hot hands and handlers.
You stand there respectable and stiff and with a straight back, you famous philosophers! – no strong wind or will propels you.
Have you never seen a sail faring over the sea, rounded and swelling and shuddering before the impetuosity of the wind?
Like a sail, shuddering before the impetuosity of the spirit, my wisdom fares over the sea – my untamed wisdom!
But you servants of the people, you famous philosophers – how could you fare with me?
....thus spake Zarathustra
Son of man first of arl, there is no need to apologize to I man, you have not offended me, suh nuh badda worry yuhself. And secondly Francis Bacon must have been stoned when him didah write dat deh paragraph, becah philosophy cannot be a reflection of nature. Otherwise what is the need to tink? Only being can reflect nature, simply becah when de mind is not there your consciousness become like a mirror, which simply reflects what ever is put before it. There is no repetition in existence, dat adde mind, existence never repeats itself, there are no two tings de same in existence. And if de I could step outta mind for just a little while, de I would realize dat de term generic has nothing to do wid de statement I man I mek, becah when I n I a look tru de prism of mind d I has arlready painted it according to I n I own ideals. jus like de prism, when de light pass tru it, it is broken into it different spectral colours, hence wid mind, it functions in de same way. You see de one ting but tru de mind many ting come out, de refraction of de light is de most commonly observed phenomenon. an dis is not de only problem becah there are many different mind out there. And de arl have dem different angle pon tings. Becah wah, any type of wave can refract, we are arl wave in an oceanic pool of consciousness. If de wave don’t pass tru at de being at de right angle, de mind will tek it somewhere else a thousand an one places.
De basic constituent of language is thought and sound, thoughts are jus waves which are translated into sound, via de frequency of language.
An there are as many definition to philosophy as there are minds, simply becah philosophy is mind, it is a product of mind, a mind game. Philosophers are nuting but gatherers of knowledge. dem go on digging around at dat which has arlways been de case, but dem don’t enter. Suh dem nuh bring een anyting revolutionary. Dem jus repeat themselves like parrots. Dem gather knowledge an store it in memory, which dem can spew in fancy rhetoric. Becah wah, dat is arl dem a duh, dem a try persuade I n I, deceive I n I. an yes having knowledge mek I n I a good contender, but it nuh do nuting fe de I being, de being gain nuting from de quest fe knowledge. Becah unless it revolutionizes de I being, any knowledge wehyah collect becomes ignorance. And dangerous too, becah de philosophizer will gather much knowledge to de point weh him tink him know, but him know nuting but dribble. Becah wah, unless de knowledge tek I being to higher levels, higher planes of existence den de knowledge wehyah collect become useless. Becah wah, to be more is far better than knowing more. Philosopher’s tark a lot of tark but it amounts to nuting but gibberish, they are intellectualizers, but dem don’t seem to know whagwaan. To know bout something and to know something are two different things. It is like de troot, again, to know it and to know about it are two different tings, I n I can read arl kinda book and listen to arl kinda people to know bout de troot but to know it I n I must live it, dat adde only way I n I can know troot tru experience. I n I cannot tek a cognitive or intellectual approach to know about troot. I n I cannot know it tru intellect, just like a blind man can knows about light but to actually know it he will need eyes. It is simple logic. Suh I n I we can only tink bout that which we arlready known an dat which is unkown what is I n I going to tink? You will be going aroun in circles wid dat which you dont know. Dis is de reason me nuh deal wid philosophy, hence de difference between life an philosophy. for thousand of years philosophers have been writing but it is not their experience becah wah. dem a tink bout it, an while dem a tink life a pass dem by, dem nuh live it. An if I n I waan learn bout life tru de book it is better to read book pon yoga, becah dem yah a deal wid experience, living. Philosophy is jus de mind trip, it simply mean moving far and far and far away from de reality. It is simply losing I n I self upon thousand upon thousand of endless thought streams weh aggo nowhere. Becah wah, it is simply thinking about tings de I don’t know or can never know.
I n I need to to be more scientific in arl adde endeavors weh I n I aggo tru. I n I affe be impersonal, becah as soon as I n I get personal and become identified den de emotions start to colour it, you paint a picture according to I n I own prejudices, and these prejudices’ are seeds planted by you, outta de knowledge wehyah store innadde memory, and dem is bound to grow inah some type of foolishness simple becah dem is not rooted witin existence, only de mind. For instance, anyting weh me aseh will have to go tru arl adde ideals and predjudices and conventions traditions, arl adde tings weh mek up I n I mind before it reaches you de being, jus like de prism one light go in different colours come out. Just sit on de fence be de witness. Philosophy is nothing, it is just an exercise in intellectual cognition, it is just a mind game whereby de philosopher jumbles up words an intellectually trows dem out. I n I cyaan know bout life tru philosophy. Becah wah, what is know about life has arlready been lived it has not been philosophized. Life has nuting to do wit philosophy, philosophy is just systems of thought, that go round it circle. When I man didah reason wit duru, I n I didah a go roun innah circles, and reach nowhere. And it is not dat I man disagree wit duru, I man never did like de merry go roun as a yoot I man did arlways jump off. becah when I n I look tru de prism of mind I n I can realize de illusion but once I n I step outta mind I n I realize arl experiences in de reality are tangible. When I n I move innah philosophy de reality is boun to be seen as illusory, becah wah philosophy creates problems in itself. Before you go into de reality I n I a mek up theories an arl kinda foolishness. An these are just words, arguments, a play wid words, rationalizations dat explain everything. And de funny ting is, de philosopher him tink him know, but in de reality him know nuting bout nuting. And what has philosophy dun for de whole? What has Philosophy dun for humanity? Nuting at arl becah wah, it keeps man in de mind thinking about ting which they know nothing about. I n I affe search in life an learn to experience its mysteries, yuh cycaan philosophize bout dem an expect fe know. If I n I love to fill up dem head wid useless philosophy den it is good to be a philosopher, becah wah, I n I will have enough paint pon de pallet fe paint a pretty picture bout life, of cause you will know nothing but you will have de knowledge an respectability, de ego will feel nice wit arl adde venerability weh yah get from de society. It puffs you up, becah yuh can talk a good talk bout nuting. I n I life don’t tek a revolutionary turn tru philosophy, there is no metamorphosis dat can happen to I n I tru philosophy, becah wah, man an man a tark fluff and jus like de clergy man dem a de priest high priest what ever yuh waan call dem even de politians dem, de whole a dem a deceived I n I wid foolishness.
An it is because of these people why I n I believe seh god debout, between these people god has arisen, and when I n I go deep innah yit I n I can realize god and de whole notion of god, it is such a stupid idea, becah wah tru out de histry of man, god has been responsible for most wars, in de name of god millions upon millions have been murder, killed an slaughtered, now anybody wid de slightest intelligence will realize dat, god is a problem not a solution. Get him outta de equation de damage weh dun can be repair. Becah along wid de theologians, philosophers, popes, priest an arl dem bwi deh, de representative of god de fiction have managed to convince de I dem of arl kinda idiotic stupidities an you have believe. Dat de eart is created, dat you is a creation of god and tru de I dem as become emotional involve de I dem have become gullible to believe. Becah wah, nun of de I dem has discovered god, de Ideal has been given, an de I dem has been gullable to receive. The very idea of god has reduce man into a puppet he is on de string an him a bob roun like seh in know. Simply becah him nuh understand him own psychology
And one ting more de I dem must understand, it is not a creation. De eart has been evolving, man has been evolving. De concept of god is against evolution. An de implication are simple, a creation is finished man is still evolving. Only man can create things which can only ever be mechanical de very notion of god destroys arl meaning to life, an de freedom weh possible fe man. But first him affe stop de foolishness an man up.
Adat me aseh
|
|
