Ark I, rather than googling two authors I mentioned just to find information to discredit my points, you could try picking up books written by either of those authors.
Acharya's book Suns of God: Buddha, Krishna, Christ Unveiled is a very large work loaded with citations which were written well before the life of Christ, at the time of his existence, and after during the expansion of Christianity, and all well before the life of Gerald Massey. And, of course she was influenced by Massey, if the I ever chooses to read him for any length of time, you'll see, he's quite brilliant.
As for Massey, he was biased because he was a witness to the corruption of the Christian church at that time in England. As for him teaching himself hieroglyphics, the I should be giving him credit for doing something most of us could not, at a time when who was teaching Ones to read hieroglyphics?
And these are not works written to say that a righteous man didn't give the Right works and teachings at that time. This is all not to say that Christ didn't exist, and I think the I is missing this crucial point. The man existed, but in order to wield power in his name people took pre existent myths, beliefs, other aspects of faith, to make Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam all easier to feed to the masses. We as people have expanded upon the foundation that our forefathers laid, and it happened with religion too, what is surprising about that.
"I wonder how long it will take for people to claim that Selassie I never existed and the story was just made up of myths from older religions."
Why wouldn't Ones know it? Nobody is writing bizarre myths about H.I.M.. His Majesty didn't walk on water, wasn't born of a virgin, didn't multiply fish, etc. etc....HIS works are pure reality, there's no myth about H.I.M.. That's the most sad thing about Iyasus, the teaching is so glorious, but it has been trampled in some mind game to subdue the masses.
The I said:
"But the biggest question is why haven't we seen the hieroglyphs that spell out all the parallels that they claim?"
The I can start with the Book of Coming Forth by Day (The Book of the Dead), get the Wallis Budge edition so an author you already know is doing the interpreting. Then you can continue on with more of Budge's translations of Kemetic and Ethiopic works, the I will see that Budge is also no stranger to the foundation laid for Christianity to build upon.
"I know the same thing can be said about what is found in the scriptures, but it seems to me that people are just trading one version of things that can't be proven with another version of things that can't be proven."
Surely the I realizes that the Bible was written waaay after the Kemetic inscriptions. So the trading that is happening would be the original for the copy, and no One is trying to prove the original as literal truth, see it?! At this point in the trod it should be clear that there are much deeper meanings in both the Bible and Kemetic writings than what appears on a superficial level.
"If people have such an issue with the bible not having solid proof for what is written, why don't they have that issue with things written in more recent books that also don't have any solid proof."
I'm not sure what recent books that have been written without very good citations and references, the I is talking about. Please share the authors and titles of books the I has read that make totally baseless claims.
Why are we debating if the I isn't studying the topic?
And last but not least, I do apologize for sounding so condescending at times in these posts. I am sincere about the reasoning...Stay Blessed...
SELAM
|
|
